Intensifying efforts
to block same-sex marriage regulations and to promote chastity in Taiwan are
led by a loose coalition of evangelical groups with worrying ties to extremist Christian
organizations in the U.S.
One of the
things we did when I was an intelligence officer was something called “link
analysis,” which consisted of establishing a full picture of the ties that
bound individuals, groups, organizations, and firms, to our targets. By doing
this, we hoped to obtain a fuller understanding of where indoctrination,
orders, and money were coming from, while enlarging the scope of our investigation if
our targets met other suspect individuals. While we could never hope to have a
complete picture of, say, a terrorist organization, it drove home the fact that
contemporary terrorist groups tend to be complex and use many fronts to
achieve their objectives.
Fast-forward
more than a decade, and I find myself once again attempting to establish a
picture of another entity that, in some but radically different ways, also
threatens society. This time, my endeavors were prompted by the campaign
against amendments to Article 972 of the Civil Code, which would legalize
same-sex unions in Taiwan, and the disgraceful actions of many participants at
the Happiness of the Next Generation Alliance rally on Nov. 30 against same-sex marriage.
What drove me to
pursue the matter was the fact that the most sustained and strident opponents
of homosexual unions in Taiwan were individuals who were closely associated
with Christian churches here. The deeper I dug, the clearer it became that
ordinary Taiwanese either didn’t care one way or another, or in fact supported the
amendment (about 53%). Those who were vocal in their opposition overwhelmingly belonged to
Christian churches, and their ideology sounded oddly similar to that which one
encounters in the most conservatives of U.S. (southern) states. In other words, despite
claims by the Alliance that homosexuality and same-sex marriage were “Western
imports,” it was becoming increasingly evident that the real foreign imports
were in fact their intolerant views and the arguments they used to “warn”
society about the ills that would befall it should 972 be amended.
I have now spent
weeks “link analyzing” the Alliance, and have made some of my findings public
in previous articles on the subject. The more I delve into this, the more I
am reminded of loose organizations like al-Qaeda (disclaimer: I do not intend to imply that the Alliance is a terrorist organization; the analogy refers
strictly to structure). Those who
have taken the lead in Taiwan opposing same-sex unions — and interestingly, in
spearheading True Love efforts to promote chastity in high-schools — are all part of
a loose network whose epicenter can be traced back to ultra-rightist evangelical
Christian organizations in the U.S. Many of the leading religious individuals here received training in divinity
with groups like the round-the-clock prayer International House of Prayer
(IHOP) and the Wagner Institute — two recurrent standouts in my research — before
returning to Taiwan to spread a rigidly theistic and zero-sum version of
Christianity that involves a blend of magic, cultism, and let’s be frank, homophobia.* Theirs is a spiritual battle to Christianize the world by spreading the gospel
in every corner of society, from schools to the workplace, our bedrooms to
government (IHOP University’s mission statement is to “equip and send out
believers who love Jesus and others wholeheartedly to preach the Word, heal the
sick, serve the poor, plant churches, lead worship, start houses of prayer, and
proclaim the return of Jesus [my italics]”). The Kingdom Revival Times, a rather useful resource, is full of news
articles about IHOP members, including Jerry Chow (周吉仁), being invited to address congregations in Taiwan.
This is where
the al-Qaeda analogy becomes useful. It would be invidious to accuse, say, IHOP
of directly involving itself in legislative decisions in Taiwan. It doesn’t
need to, as it has indoctrinated foot soldiers to do so on behalf of its
doctrinaire view of the world. This is very similar to many of the terrorist
organizations that sprang up all over the world following the Sept. 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks in the U.S. and after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan.
Although most of those offshoots subscribed to al-Qaeda ideology, and many of
their leaders and foot soldiers had at some point received training in al-Qaeda
camps, al-Qaeda central had little direct say over what those organizations
did. Most of the time, their actions served al-Qaeda’s grand purpose, though admittedly they sometimes undermined the cause. Regardless, the loose structure of the
“alliance” made establishing a full picture of the constellation a near
impossibility.
On a smaller scale, the same can be said of the overlapping evangelical Christian organizations across the U.S. that advocate hardline views on homosexuality, abortion, and “intelligent design” (creationism), which extend tentacles in government, courthouses, universities, and the media.
On a smaller scale, the same can be said of the overlapping evangelical Christian organizations across the U.S. that advocate hardline views on homosexuality, abortion, and “intelligent design” (creationism), which extend tentacles in government, courthouses, universities, and the media.
This structure
is now being replicated in Taiwan, and I suspect, across Asia. And as in the
U.S., they have been recruiting wealthy individuals and government officials in
positions of influence to push policies that ill reflect the wishes of the
moderate majority. There is now in Taiwan a cross-pollinating (no pun intended)
constellation of Christian churches and bible study centers that recruit, train,
and indoctrinate Taiwanese, who are then encouraged to spread the gospel. Conduct
Google searches on almost any of them or their leaders — the Bread of Life
Christian Church, Agape Christian Church, Top Church, New Life (yes, Ted Haggard), Impact Bible School, Asia
for Jesus, “Workplace House of Prayer” — and you will eventually unearth
connections to IHOP, Wagner, and other religious organizations that all share the
characteristics of cults.
Despite the
relatively small number of its members, this loose alliance tends to punch
above its weight, perhaps because of the tendency of society and governments to
bend over backwards to make sure we show no disrespect to religion (in fact I
suspect that this may be one of the reasons why police officers stood
by on Nov. 30 as Alliance members blocked and surrounded proponents of same-sex
marriage in a public space). Those groups have infiltrated the halls of
government and our schools, encouraging high-school children to sign a pledge
to chastity until marriage (science demonstrates that such efforts have failed miserably) or forcing upon them literature on the alleged
dangers of homosexual unions. Such efforts will only intensify as the groups further consolidate their presence in Taiwan.
Scary stuff.
* I doubt that organizations like IHOP would be able to indoctrinate Taiwanese minds to the same extent as, say, in Uganda, where their rhetoric has reached levels of encouraging people to kill homosexuals. Among other things, their reach in Taiwan is hampered by socio-economic conditions, not to mention education levels, that differ markedly from those seen in countries like Uganda, where missionary and humanitarian work serve as the entry point to proselytizing. It is difficult to imagine Taiwanese, even those who oppose same-sex marriage on religious grounds, being receptive to calls to kill homosexuals or imprison them for life. Limitations notwithstanding, cultish groups like IHOP can do severe harm to modern societies like Taiwan by spreading intolerance and irrationalism.
NEW! A Chinese version of this article is available here.
* I doubt that organizations like IHOP would be able to indoctrinate Taiwanese minds to the same extent as, say, in Uganda, where their rhetoric has reached levels of encouraging people to kill homosexuals. Among other things, their reach in Taiwan is hampered by socio-economic conditions, not to mention education levels, that differ markedly from those seen in countries like Uganda, where missionary and humanitarian work serve as the entry point to proselytizing. It is difficult to imagine Taiwanese, even those who oppose same-sex marriage on religious grounds, being receptive to calls to kill homosexuals or imprison them for life. Limitations notwithstanding, cultish groups like IHOP can do severe harm to modern societies like Taiwan by spreading intolerance and irrationalism.
NEW! A Chinese version of this article is available here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.