Chen Lee Shen (陳李慎) came to Taipei from Tainan to join a sit-in rally on Jinan Road calling for Chen’s release that was organized by various pro-localization groups, including some Democratic Progressive Party officials from southern Taiwan.
“I have not seen my son for so long. I have not heard his voice for so long,” she said, crying. “I feel deep sadness and pain every day. I am more than 80 years old, but I have to live with that pain every day.”
Today marks the former president’s 551st day in custody over money laundering and graft charges.
“My son has been wronged. He is innocent,” his mother told the crowd.
Chen Lee Shen was accompanied by her two daughters and Chen Shui-bian’s son, Chen Chih-chung (陳致中).
An estimated 5,000 people joined the rally. Hundreds of Chen and Taiwanese independence supporters were bused in from all over the country to join the protest.
The Taiwan High Court last month prolonged Chen’s detention until June 23.
“The justice system is dead, but A-Bian [Chen Shui-bian] is not lonely. A-Bian’s mother is not lonely. We are always with them and will always support them,” Central Taiwan Society president Chen Wan-te (陳萬得) told the crowd.
A few blocks away on Ketagalan Boulevard, a second protest took place. Unlike the rambunctious crowd on Jinan Road, however, this protest offered something far more sober: silence. Under the watchful eye of a dozen police officers, more than 1,000 plastic stools were arranged, each anchoring a balloon. When viewed from above, they formed the character “Ma,” or horse — President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) surname — with a large yellow arrow pointing at the Presidential Office a few hundred meters away. At one point, a Buddhist monk walked among the chairs and stood there for a few moments in contemplation.
“Justice is dead,” read signs posted around the venue. A picture of a plaque from Green Island, which served as a prison for political prisoners during the White Terror era, also graced the area.
The former president was first detained on Nov. 12, 2008, and released on Dec. 13, 2008, following his indictment. He was detained again on Dec. 30, 2008, after the Taipei District Court approved a request by prosecutors to take him back into custody. He has remained in detention ever since.
This article, which I co-wrote with Rich Chang, appeared today in the Taipei Times.
Initially, I wasn't supposed to be at the event, let alone covering it. This is why I didn't have a camera with me, which is a shame, as the protest on Jinan Road was, as most protests in Taiwan are, colorful and very entertaining. The silent protest, which no one else seems to have bothered writing about, was also very moving, and sadly no good pictures of it were taken. I chatted there for a while with the chairman of Taiwan Society North, who played no small role in organizing the whole thing, and a few other demonstrators. Rich's assessment of the number of people in the crowd was far higher than mine, which explains why the final article put it at 5,000; it should be said, however, that unlike a parade, this event was more of the kind that people come over for a while, walk around, chat with people, and leave. So the total number of participants may indeed have been higher.
2 comments:
Honestly Mike, cry me a river... Busloads of Chen supporters coming in from all over Taiwan? Are they mental?
They're not actually protesting the legality of the detention and prosecution of Chen, they actually believe he's innocent. "We'll always support them", sais Chen Wan-te.
If Chen Shui-bian is innocent I'll show my ass in Sogo.
Steve: In reporting this event, I did not take any position as to whether protesters were doing so for the “right” reasons. I must say, however, that while there were hardcore Chen supporters who were there saying that the former president is innocent, many others were there to protest the legality of his detention — that’s what the posters and banners said.
I’m not saying the chances are high that you’ll be exposing your behind at Sogo, though you should keep in mind that what Chen is accused of largely stems from unclear rules and past practices by government officials for which they, unlike him, were not prosecuted. This doesn’t make what he probably did “right,” but it surely points to a judicial that seems to be conveniently selective in the cases it undertakes.
Post a Comment